Skip to main content Skip to footer
Artists Downloads Jul 21, 2026

Horse Lords: Inside Their Microtonal Universe

Sixteen years on from their formation, and with three-quarters of the band now living across the ocean in Germany, Baltimore quartet Horse Lords remain tethered to something that resists the distance between them. Formed by Owen Gardner, Max Eilbacher and Sam Haberman prior to the addition of saxophonist Andrew Bernstein, the quartet grew from the ashes of experimental collective Teeth Mountain to quickly transcend the conventions of noise rock.

Across seven albums, they've developed a language rooted in minimalism, just intonation and non-Western tuning systems where dense rhythmic counterpoint and microscopic harmonic shifts somehow never lose their pulse. Those ideas are ambitiously displayed on their latest LP, Demand to Be Taken to Heaven Alive!, which dives deeper still into recursive algorithms, microtonality and mathematical structures.

The album is also Horse Lords’ first to be assembled across multiple cities, with Ableton Live central to the band’s more deliberate exchange of sketches, demos and arrangements. We speak to Bernstein about how he uses the software as a compositional laboratory alongside Live 12's long-awaited support for microtonality, which finally allowed him to seamlessly integrate synthesised textures into Horse Lords' hybrid yet human sound.

Blank placeholder image
Horse Lords - “Demand To Be Taken To Heaven Alive!”
Before experimental music entered the picture, what kind of music were you listening to and playing as a teenager?

I was interested in jazz, but also liked playing instruments and making sound. As a teenager, I played clarinet in the school orchestra, but when I started to come of age and get into punk rock in the early-to-mid ‘90s, clarinet didn't really seem to have a place in that world. I learned how to play drums because bands would practice at my house and then I started playing guitar in a grindcore band because we thought it was a funny genre – we were kind of like a slapstick grindcore band.

Horse Lords’ Andrew Bernstein in his home studio

Your path into playing saxophone seemed to come about accidentally. What made you connect with the instrument?

My experience playing heavy music in high school made me receptive to extreme sounds and I was getting more into noise music, electronics, free jazz and avant-jazz. It was actually my brother who played saxophone and one of my college roommates played the instrument in grade school. He basically lent it to me while I was becoming less inspired by the guitar.

You’ve also described having an interest in circuit bending, which is uncommon for a teenager?

I’d never considered circuit bending as a possibility for generating sound, but when I discovered there was music being made this way it was definitely a paradigm shift. It really blew my mind that you could open up an instrument and make sounds that it wasn't designed to make. I was studying electronic music at university and got very interested in recreating textures, repetitive minimalism and drone music, so I started treating the saxophone using circular breathing to create a never-ending cascade of notes using the embouchure like a filter.

Blank placeholder image
Horse Lords playing “Zero Degree Machine” live
When you joined Horse Lords, was there an immediate sense that this was the right fit?

It was pretty immediate. Max, Owen and I had already played in a band together and were hanging out a lot. I remember organising a dance performance where there were three string players and an upright bass. I was playing percussion, Max was playing some sort of noise violin and Owen played cello, so we were making very polyrhythmic music drawing on the harmonic series.

Out of that collaboration we wanted to keep playing together, but I wasn't playing saxophone at first - I joined to add percussive texture to the rhythm. Then one day I told the band that I was going to bring the saxophone along to see where it might fit in.

“Support for microtonality in Ableton Live made a huge difference for us. It meant we could use any of Live's instrument Packs and software synthesisers while still playing in our preferred tuning system.”

The Horse Lords sound is very much built on tension and counterpoint. Some bands generate that through friction. How do you find that intensity?

We have disagreements, but I wouldn't say they’re antagonistic and I actually think the counterpoint comes from resolving some of the tension because we all try to be kind to each other when it comes to rejecting each other’s ideas. We all want to make good music and work towards the same goals, so when ideas are shot down it never feels like a personal attack.

I mean, there are certainly times where we don't totally understand how something’s going to work out, but we’re willing to see an idea through to its final stages. The album version is rarely the definitive version because it continues to change when we play it live, so the compositional process never really ends.

Your debut album consisted of two quite long-form pieces, but later albums are structured around a larger number of compositions. What prompted that evolution?

Horse Lords came out as a two-track instrumental record, but as we developed as musicians we came to realise the tracks didn’t necessarily require that kind of duration and it became a challenge to develop them into a higher-stakes album format. At the same time, there’s a maturity to sitting with an idea, repeating something over and over and having the confidence to resist the urge to change something just to keep it interesting.

Your latest LP, Demand to Be Taken to Heaven Alive! is the first that you've made remotely. Was that process purely due to logistics or did you actively want to experiment with working independently from each other?

It was mostly due to logistics, although I don't think we would do it again this way and don't have to now because our drummer Sam has also moved to Germany. Demand to Be Taken to Heaven Alive! is probably the capstone of this last five years, which has been a challenge, but satisfying and fun.

There’s something exhilarating about sending lots of files back and forth and getting excited when we hear the response to somebody’s demo or sequence. In that way, everything was a bit slow motion. Rather than play together and work things out in real-time like we usually do, we’d take a couple of weeks before getting a musical response to an idea.

One benefit of working separately is that you might feel less inhibited; on the other hand, I was wondering whether you get the same musical cohesion when having to construct tracks like a jigsaw puzzle?

To your first point, we've always shared little MIDI sequences before band practice so we could see where an idea might evolve, so maybe there was less evolution, or a different kind of evolution of the material doing it this way, but I’ve never felt self-conscious sharing ideas because we’ve played together for so long that I trust they think I'm a good musician and composer.

On the other hand, there are certain songs where the groove may have benefited from us playing together in a room to get it super tight before recording. I think it worked out well enough and technology like Ableton assists us in making that process as seamless as possible when it comes to recording at different locations, lining things up and sequencing parts. Technologies like Ableton make this possible –  25 years ago it would have been a lot harder.

Blank placeholder image
Horse Lords live in Leipzig
How much conversation happens around what an album is about before anyone starts composing?

Because of how Demand to Be Taken to Heaven Alive! was made, we did have to be more intentional about how we were going into it from the start. This was the first time that we discussed, not only the material that we wanted to use for a vocal piece like “Eureka”, but the musical themes we wanted to explore from a philosophical viewpoint.

The ideas on our past records were much more subliminal. Again, we’ve played together for so long and we all share books, notes, podcasts and talk a lot about philosophy, art and musical aesthetics, so it's not like we have to have a thematic conversation when we're starting to make an album.

“What interests me about music is the process of making and sharing, and I enjoy the struggle. If I'd just generated a song, I don't know whether we'd be connecting over talking about music.”

You've always been fairly disciplined about working within the limitations of the quartet, but this time collaborators were brought in. Was that to solve specific compositional problems?

We wanted to include vocals in a new way, but didn't want to do it ourselves so we had to bring people in. Then we later added a trombone and bass clarinet player. That was really a product of the new community that we're now a part of in Berlin, although, funnily enough, everyone that we collaborated with is American.

We've always been part of a scene. In Baltimore, there were guys playing around with synthesisers on some of our first records and M.C. Schmidt from Matmos used to play with us and appears on one of our early mix tapes. This album was a continuation of that impulse, but in a new setting.

You mentioned building demos and sketches in Ableton before they became full Horse Lord pieces. Can you expand on that process?

It's something I've always done because Ableton is my DAW choice. When I'm sketching or making an addition to something that another band member has shared, Ableton is the place I'll go to first to generate and sketch ideas. I'm not sure if everybody in Horse Lords has Ableton yet, but I'm sure everybody has used it at some point. I know Max does, and Owen used it to do a lot of the heavy lifting when mixing the record.

Horse Lords - “Before The Law”
Say, for example, you came up with a saxophone part that you thought was worthy of exploring. How, in practical terms, might you work with Ableton to use that as a sketch or framework for a track?

Most of it starts with a drumbeat or rhythm section, so I'll compose drum patterns in Ableton to map out an initial sketch, which are always subject to change once they get in the hands of the musicians that are going to play on them. Sam and Max have their own idiosyncratic styles, so I sort of know how they’ll play, but I'll often try and compose something in the style of Max’s bass playing even if I don't know how he’ll truly feel until he hears it.

For my saxophone parts, I'll sketch out a rhythm section part in Ableton and record myself over it, which is kind of what I did for the full session that I shared with you for the track “Before the Law”. That began with a drum and bass idea that I’d originally envisioned for my droning saxophone parts and Owen’s EBow guitar, but we liked the way that it sounded with the saxophone.

You’ve mentioned that the additional microtuning support in Live 12 made it possible to use Ableton within the Horse Lords context. I was wondering what specific limitations you were running up against before that update came along?

Support for microtonality in Ableton Live made a huge difference for us. It meant we could use any of Live's instrument Packs and software synthesisers while still playing in our preferred tuning system. Ever since Horse Lords started, I've used Live for sketching ideas, but because we write in a microtonal just intonation scale, those sketches couldn't easily become part of the final recordings. Once Live supported microtonal tuning, we could use those same sounds, not just for generating ideas, but as finished recordings on the record itself.

What role did your own programming work using SuperCollider and Max for Live play in shaping the album?

Some of the material I shared for the track “Second Galactic Utopia”, particularly the English horn line, relates back to an algorithm we developed in SuperCollider. It's not necessarily the pitches themselves, but the rhythm and form of that passage that come from the algorithm. Variations of the same process also appear on the title track, at the end of “Brain of the Firm”, and possibly elsewhere throughout the record.

We've always incorporated electronics into the band's music, originally working primarily with Max/MSP and, more recently, SuperCollider. Our experience with Max/MSP has also enabled us to develop custom tools in Max for Live, and that's an approach we'll likely continue to explore. The story is still evolving.

Why incorporate algorithms into a band that thrives on intuitive, collaborative playing?

We've always been fascinated by how much compelling material you can generate from the smallest musical seed. We've all been influenced by the late American composer Tom Johnson, particularly his book Self-Similar Melodies, which explores how fractal geometry can be applied to melodic lines.

We were really taken with a lot of his writing, and although none of us have a formal background in mathematics, we adapted one of his recursive algorithms to produce expanding numerical patterns that became the basis for several melodies. We then orchestrated those ideas across the band and electronic instruments - sometimes played quickly, sometimes slowly. It’s a recurring theme over the course of the record.

Blank placeholder image
Horse Lords - “Eureka 378-B / Brain of the Firm”
Is the goal to use algorithms to generate individual musical ideas or create a compositional system that shapes the entire record?

A little bit of both. We're interested in generative ideas and how complex, spiralling structures can emerge from the simplest musical seeds. Part of the appeal is that, as a listener, you can often sense there's an underlying logic to the melodies without being able to identify exactly how it works. It's slightly opaque but always on the verge of recognition, and that tension is really satisfying. That idea has deep historical roots too. Early Renaissance music, for example, often used isorhythmic techniques in which rhythmic and melodic cycles of different lengths gradually phase against one another, creating intricate patterns that reveal themselves over time.

Exploring those kinds of structures is an inquisitive, self-learning process. It's fascinating, but we were never interested in just presenting the algorithm because that approach has been explored before. Although that can be interesting, we wanted to abstract it further - to orchestrate the material for the band and bring a human element to something that began as a mathematical system.

Blank placeholder image
Horse Lords – “Second Galactic Utopia”
So what's your feeling on artificial intelligence, which has the capacity to take this algorithmic element and push it to its furthest extent?

What interests me about music is the process of making and sharing it, and I enjoy the struggle. It starts from demos we made, goes back and forth through different iterations with other people and then we arrive at the completed work, which I’m talking to you about now. If I’d just generated a song, I don't know whether we’d be connecting over talking about music.

I've played around with LLMs out of curiosity, but I'm not that impressed with what they can do. Then again, I'm not a computer programmer, so maybe AI could be of use in the context of coding to help adapt an algorithm that I'm interested in using to generate melodies.

Rewinding to something you mentioned earlier regarding the English horn stem on “Second Galactic Utopia”. It was taken from the sample pack, Orchestral Woodwinds, but why not have someone play that part from within the Berlin community?

We were moving towards the end of the process and felt the track was still missing something. As the deadline approached, I was trying to find the right sound, but we simply ran out of time to schedule another recording session. In the end, we kept the sampled English horn because we liked how it sounded, but I think that also says something about the quality of modern orchestral sample libraries.


Follow Horse Lords on Bandcamp and Instagram

Text and interview: Danny Turner
Photos: Kasia Zacharko, Justin Tsucalas