post your SMALL L5 requests
post your SMALL L5 requests
I know the Abe's did a fantastic job with the new version,
and this might not be the right time to ask for some features,
but there are some little things I really wish we're different..
So since the beta forum is only for bugs,
it might be a good thing to post your opinions here about LITTLE adjustments,
so don't ask for things like '200 Impulse slots' or 'Simpler sample layering'..
Mine are;
1. It would be usefull to have a slightly thicker grid stroke for 'bars' in the clips and arrange..
There is a difference between 'beats' and 'notes' allready, but not between 'beats' and 'bars'...
---------
2. Bigger [typo]graphical contrast in the browser..
They announced it like this;
But in beta1 they changed the folder icon and it's sub content to an arrow,
not very clear i.m.o.
Or if you want to stick to the arrow option,
could you at least make the 'instruments' and 'effect units' titles a bit more heavier than the sub content?
--------
and this might not be the right time to ask for some features,
but there are some little things I really wish we're different..
So since the beta forum is only for bugs,
it might be a good thing to post your opinions here about LITTLE adjustments,
so don't ask for things like '200 Impulse slots' or 'Simpler sample layering'..
Mine are;
1. It would be usefull to have a slightly thicker grid stroke for 'bars' in the clips and arrange..
There is a difference between 'beats' and 'notes' allready, but not between 'beats' and 'bars'...
---------
2. Bigger [typo]graphical contrast in the browser..
They announced it like this;
But in beta1 they changed the folder icon and it's sub content to an arrow,
not very clear i.m.o.
Or if you want to stick to the arrow option,
could you at least make the 'instruments' and 'effect units' titles a bit more heavier than the sub content?
--------
-
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 10:52 am
yes, agree with both of you guys on your points
the old folder system seems to be way easier on the eyes.
my two main simple gripes with Live?:
1 - its extremely short on simple efficiency features ... like, no custom keyboard shortcuts, and limited use of double click shortcuts .. like globalgoons suggestion.
why? the whole philosphy behind this thing is based efficiency and simplicity ... they even left the right click menu out for 5 versions probably because they thought it caused to much clutter :
i can see the conference room arguments now "but bernhard we are not microsoft!!! now go get the wienershnitzel ..."
2 - i hate to say it but i think they need to hire some visual interface design people to overhaul the color schemes, and polish it so its not making your eyes cross to see / distinguish between elements
.
the old folder system seems to be way easier on the eyes.
my two main simple gripes with Live?:
1 - its extremely short on simple efficiency features ... like, no custom keyboard shortcuts, and limited use of double click shortcuts .. like globalgoons suggestion.
why? the whole philosphy behind this thing is based efficiency and simplicity ... they even left the right click menu out for 5 versions probably because they thought it caused to much clutter :
i can see the conference room arguments now "but bernhard we are not microsoft!!! now go get the wienershnitzel ..."
2 - i hate to say it but i think they need to hire some visual interface design people to overhaul the color schemes, and polish it so its not making your eyes cross to see / distinguish between elements
.
--
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
NEW SPECS: Athlon 4200+ dual; A8N-SLI m/b; Win XP Home SP2; 1 GB RAM; 2x 7200 RPM HDD: 1 internal, 1 Firewire 800 (Firewire is project data drive); M-Audio Triggerfinger
josh 'vonster' von; tracks and sets
http://www.joshvon.com
I have to agree with the folders. I like them but theres something about them I dont like and its probably the 'easy on the eyes' factor.
Im also suprised that no one has commented on the new transport feature. Im really trying to get used to it but this is the third time it has changed in 3 versions and I still like the very first one we had. I just got used to the newest one and now theres this one.
IMO, things like this cannot be changed on a whim. Whatever method a DAW uses we eventually get used to it. It becomes an extension of your arm or mouse and we do it without thinking. Now we have to get used to a thrid version of transport
Im also suprised that no one has commented on the new transport feature. Im really trying to get used to it but this is the third time it has changed in 3 versions and I still like the very first one we had. I just got used to the newest one and now theres this one.
IMO, things like this cannot be changed on a whim. Whatever method a DAW uses we eventually get used to it. It becomes an extension of your arm or mouse and we do it without thinking. Now we have to get used to a thrid version of transport
I thought I was the only one who wasn't thrilled about the folders turning into arrows.
It looks like a diff GUI lib used to render it. I had assumed it was needed to accomodate the browser searching, but it doesn't look as slick as it used to.
It looks like a diff GUI lib used to render it. I had assumed it was needed to accomodate the browser searching, but it doesn't look as slick as it used to.
no longer needed. this is for you. you know who you are.
I prefer the old folders as well.StompyJ wrote:I thought I was the only one who wasn't thrilled about the folders turning into arrows.
It looks like a diff GUI lib used to render it. I had assumed it was needed to accomodate the browser searching, but it doesn't look as slick as it used to.
Another thing I still can't get used to is that the browser steals the keyboard focus from kbd automation. Seems like a bad choice of preferences, esp considering that the browser is always open by default and gets open whenever you switch presets etc.
Last edited by Poster on Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I really like the new layout. And the arrows do a good job of illustrating, that there's more going on under the hood, that you CAN actually extract bits of a file by expanding it.
The only thing I would keep is the little black and green ableton logos for the files, but live5 has a diff. colour scheme, so I reckon it's not going to happen.
The only thing I would keep is the little black and green ableton logos for the files, but live5 has a diff. colour scheme, so I reckon it's not going to happen.
mbp 2.66, osx 10.6.8, 8GB ram.
Please make it so the ableton effects presets are not part of the browser. If im making a track, i need all the screen space i can get, and so ill close the browser when i dont need it. In Live 5, if i want to toggle through some effects presets to preview the sound, Live 5 will automatically open the browser for me. Pain. What was wrong with the menu? Or even better, why not do what Live does with VSTs, which is open up an optional popup to the side eith the presets on it?
its really the only thing bugging me about the new live, which is otherwise ace.
its really the only thing bugging me about the new live, which is otherwise ace.
oh dang that's a good idea. just have a little thing jutt out from the side of the effect or instrument with all the presets. then when your done, you can just close that little thingy jutting out by click a little X in the corner or something.dannyk wrote:Please make it so the ableton effects presets are not part of the browser. If im making a track, i need all the screen space i can get, and so ill close the browser when i dont need it. In Live 5, if i want to toggle through some effects presets to preview the sound, Live 5 will automatically open the browser for me. Pain. What was wrong with the menu? Or even better, why not do what Live does with VSTs, which is open up an optional popup to the side eith the presets on it?
its really the only thing bugging me about the new live, which is otherwise ace.
maybe version 5.1
hey i was wondering, why doesn't Ableton ask us if we will like what they're doing before they start working on it? just have a part of the site reserved for registered Live users, and have polls on new features and how they should be implemented.
The new features of Live look nice to me but IMO don't seem to me to warrant a new version number (or at least don't warrant the front-page hype " the team's biggest development effort since the initial release of Live in 2001")... I mean they mostly seem like work-flow/management stuff, or catch-up stuff that should have been there already (clip freeze and plug-in delay compensation). IMO, the jump from v3 to v4 seemed much more exciting and revolutionary. Still I'm happy with more effects and improved workflow...
Anyway, as for my request list... mostly I would like more modulation options. It would be nice to have a single controller control many parameters. So for example I could have something setup so that as I raise the cutoff frequency of my filter it also simultaneously controls the send level to a delay or whatever. One way it could be implemented could be something like on the nord micromodular, where there are something like 4 group knobs (sorry I forget what thery are called) which can be assigned to control multiple parameters, and then the user merely assigns their own controller to control that group knob. So iive might allow to have a fixed number of uber/group controllers...
additional request would be for a library of basic controller curves (ableton supplied as well as with user-created presets) that could be freely and quickly assigned to whatever parameter. These curves could also be quickly saved on the fly to the library.
multiple controllers to one parameter would be nice as well...
I guess a modulation matrix in general could be helpful.
I'd love to have an individual midi note along with a note specific adsr envelope control a parameter. could be fun but may be outside the scope of Live...
-scotty
Anyway, as for my request list... mostly I would like more modulation options. It would be nice to have a single controller control many parameters. So for example I could have something setup so that as I raise the cutoff frequency of my filter it also simultaneously controls the send level to a delay or whatever. One way it could be implemented could be something like on the nord micromodular, where there are something like 4 group knobs (sorry I forget what thery are called) which can be assigned to control multiple parameters, and then the user merely assigns their own controller to control that group knob. So iive might allow to have a fixed number of uber/group controllers...
additional request would be for a library of basic controller curves (ableton supplied as well as with user-created presets) that could be freely and quickly assigned to whatever parameter. These curves could also be quickly saved on the fly to the library.
multiple controllers to one parameter would be nice as well...
I guess a modulation matrix in general could be helpful.
I'd love to have an individual midi note along with a note specific adsr envelope control a parameter. could be fun but may be outside the scope of Live...
-scotty
I totally agree with you. Like the new arrows, but also like the old logo for live sets.Machinate wrote:I really like the new layout. And the arrows do a good job of illustrating, that there's more going on under the hood, that you CAN actually extract bits of a file by expanding it.
The only thing I would keep is the little black and green ableton logos for the files, but live5 has a diff. colour scheme, so I reckon it's not going to happen.
iMac Retina 4K 3.3Ghz i7, 16Gb RAM
Live Suite 9.7.1 + Reason 9.1 + Pianoteq 5 + Sibelius 8.5
Listen on Soundcloud
Live Suite 9.7.1 + Reason 9.1 + Pianoteq 5 + Sibelius 8.5
Listen on Soundcloud