Elastique 2.0 released.. better timestretch??

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Post Reply
timothyallan
Posts: 5788
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia
Contact:

Elastique 2.0 released.. better timestretch??

Post by timothyallan » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:14 am

March 10, 2008
zplane unveils version 2 of the time stretching and pitch shifting engines Elastique Pro and Elastique efficient. Elastique stretching can be found as an integral part of numerous digital audio workstations and DJ applications.

The new version offers many audio quality enhancements, including better transient preservation, increased bass resolution and improved high tonal frequency processing. Many optimizations and new interface functionality improve the performance, integration and handling of Elastique significantly.

The Elastique time stretching engines are used in many applications of the music, film, broadcast, and entertainment industry. Transparent audio quality combined with real-time processing capabilities have made Elastique the de facto standard for time scaling in real-time audio applications.

forge
Posts: 17422
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:47 am
Location: Queensland, AU
Contact:

Post by forge » Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:38 am

8)

I wonder when it will make it into Live?

lunabass
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 7:13 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Elastique 2.0 released.. better timestretch??

Post by lunabass » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:23 am

timothyallan wrote:March 10, 2008
Elastique stretching can be found as an integral part of numerous digital audio workstations and DJ applications.
what applications currently use elastique?
:: STAK ::
Music for Visual Media
www.staksounds.com
@staksounds

thefool
Posts: 1848
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:29 pm

Post by thefool » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:25 am

Experience the amazing quality of our élastique time stretching and pitch shifting engines in (listed alphabetically):

ableton Live 5, 6, 7 (élastique efficient)
acoustica MixCraft 2.5, 3 (élastique efficient)
ALCATech BPMStudio 5 (élastique efficient)
ALCATech DigiScratch 2 (élastique efficient)
Bias Inc. Peak 5.x (élastique efficient)
Cockos Reaper 2.x (élastique Pro)
HighAndes Trakax 1 and higher (élastique SOLOIST & efficient)
Image-Line FLStudio 5, 6 (élastique efficient)
Image-Line FLStudio 7 (élastique Pro)
Mackie Tracktion 3 (élastique efficient)
M-Audio Torq 1.5 (élastique efficient)
Native Instruments Kontakt 1.5, 2 (élastique SOLOIST V1)
Native Instruments Intakt (élastique SOLOIST V1)
Native Instruments Traktor 2, 3 (élastique efficient V1)
SampleBase.com Satellite (élastique SOLOIST)
Steinberg Cubase 4 (élastique SOLOIST)
überschall Elastik loop player (élastique Pro)
xtsoftware energyXT 2 (élastique efficient)
zero-x BeatQuantizer (PolyStretcher) 1 (élastique efficient)
so flstudio actually started using PRO since 7.

lunabass
Posts: 994
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 7:13 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Post by lunabass » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:27 am

well there you go. i just always assumed that ableton made the stretching algorithms for live.. :oops:
:: STAK ::
Music for Visual Media
www.staksounds.com
@staksounds

thefool
Posts: 1848
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:29 pm

Post by thefool » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:28 am


Nod
Posts: 783
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:18 pm

Post by Nod » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:40 am


Coupe70
Posts: 1099
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:25 am
Location: Mainz / Germany
Contact:

Post by Coupe70 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:03 pm

hm, strange. for me timestretching in traktor feels much better
than in live. but it´s the same algorithm. am i wrong ?
traktor has 3 timestretching modes, what is that about ?
Phongemeinschaft (Live-ElectroJazz / NuJazz)
Homepage - youtube - Like! :-)
Live 9 (32Bit), HP DV7, i5 2,53GHz, 8 GB RAM, Win7 (64Bit)

Khazul
Posts: 3185
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: Reading, UK

Post by Khazul » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:31 pm

Coupe70 wrote:hm, strange. for me timestretching in traktor feels much better
than in live.
I have allways though that too, artifacts in live seem way way more obvious, though it could simply be that with tractor Im focussed way more on the prgression of the music in a set rather than the sonic details of producing a good mix of a track.

I dont know if elastique has anything to do with beat/tempo analysis, but Live certain seems beter at it than tractor.
Nothing to see here - move along!

nebulae
Posts: 15716
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:16 am
Location: New Orleans
Contact:

Post by nebulae » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:56 pm

wow, Reaper uses the Pro version. Time and time again, this sequencer continues to amaze me...


mikemc
Posts: 5455
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Post by mikemc » Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:43 pm

A prophet! boldly prophetic! Burn him! :)
UTENZIL a tool... of the muse.

Post Reply