Live 7 release Audio drivers for PT?
Live 7 release Audio drivers for PT?
I am using an original Mbox with Ableton 7.0.2 and Protools LE 7.4. on a Mac dual core running Tiger 10.4.9 with 4GB.
Now I have selected PT as my editor in Live 7 which is fine but when i go to open it it says
Digidesign drivers in use Error -1133
Is there anyway for Live 7 to release the Mbox drivers whilst im in the other application? or can it use coreaudio with both applications at the same time?
I did want to use 3 main programs on the mac, Logic 8, Live 7 and PT all with the mbox but is this possible? I know i can run rewire so for example i can use Logc and Live rewired together as one, but will PT still open??
is there anyway around this other than buying another soundcard?
Thanks in advance
Now I have selected PT as my editor in Live 7 which is fine but when i go to open it it says
Digidesign drivers in use Error -1133
Is there anyway for Live 7 to release the Mbox drivers whilst im in the other application? or can it use coreaudio with both applications at the same time?
I did want to use 3 main programs on the mac, Logic 8, Live 7 and PT all with the mbox but is this possible? I know i can run rewire so for example i can use Logc and Live rewired together as one, but will PT still open??
is there anyway around this other than buying another soundcard?
Thanks in advance
-
- Posts: 1743
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 5:07 am
- Location: Melbourne AU
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
The MBOX and PTLE are the demon spawn of Satan.
Crappy performance and drivers (someone told me 512 samples is the minimum latency), no Plugin Delay Compensation, awful dated GUI, poor MIDI that makes Live look great (and not much does MIDI wise).
I'd rather cut off my balls and fire them from a big top circus cannon than use Digidesign's 500 dollar freeware and CRAPBOX.
Logic at least is a reasonable DAW to go with Live.
Crappy performance and drivers (someone told me 512 samples is the minimum latency), no Plugin Delay Compensation, awful dated GUI, poor MIDI that makes Live look great (and not much does MIDI wise).
I'd rather cut off my balls and fire them from a big top circus cannon than use Digidesign's 500 dollar freeware and CRAPBOX.
Logic at least is a reasonable DAW to go with Live.
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.
that is exactly how i view pro tools. its no better than alot of the freeware out there.leedsquietman wrote:Digidesign's 500 dollar freeware and CRAPBOX.
here is a little list of things that i hate about pro tools.
no track freezing, what the hell is with that? this is suppose to be the standard?
the gui, its so ugly i cant stand it.
having to use the keyboard for alot of dumb crap like switching between mix and edit views.
the way the grid is set up makes it a pain in the ass to zoom in and fine edit without high lighting a piece of audio you didint want to select.
it takes up more resources than any other daw i have seen, just opening pro tools takes almost 300mb of ram on my system, live takes up about 120mb.
the whole routing system is a total pain in the ass.
all around it is a horrible daw to create music in. it might be good as just a tape recorder but so is alot of freeware.
its a pile of shit in my opinion and way way way behind the times.
The Push / Novation Launch Pad / Novation Launch Pad Pro / Novation Launch Key
/ Launch Control XL / Machine MkII / Machine Studio / BeatStep / Livid OhmRGB / Livid Code V2 / Apc 40 MKII
no computers or synths
20 Copies of Ableton Live Lite.
/ Launch Control XL / Machine MkII / Machine Studio / BeatStep / Livid OhmRGB / Livid Code V2 / Apc 40 MKII
no computers or synths
20 Copies of Ableton Live Lite.
So in your opinion why is Pro Tools rated as the leader in the industry? Are there any good points about it that you can name?leedsquietman wrote:The MBOX and PTLE are the demon spawn of Satan.
Crappy performance and drivers (someone told me 512 samples is the minimum latency), no Plugin Delay Compensation, awful dated GUI, poor MIDI that makes Live look great (and not much does MIDI wise).
I'd rather cut off my balls and fire them from a big top circus cannon than use Digidesign's 500 dollar freeware and CRAPBOX.
Logic at least is a reasonable DAW to go with Live.
I have heard so much good reviews from people that do my genre of music that I am seriously thinking about giving PT a try.
fe real!
-
- Posts: 1683
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:49 am
- Location: NOW
Re: Live 7 release Audio drivers for PT?
buckman wrote:I am using an original Mbox with Ableton 7.0.2 and Protools LE 7.4. on a Mac dual core running Tiger 10.4.9 with 4GB.
Now I have selected PT as my editor in Live 7 which is fine but when i go to open it it says
Digidesign drivers in use Error -1133
you can't do this with PT, PT must always be opened first.
buckman sorry if I'm about to hijack your thread but I have been drawn in by the comments on Pro Tools.
I have recently started using Pro Tools again (after putting it down for a year) because I wanted to use the following capabilities that are currently not available in Live ...
Audio quantizing and grooving
Region Fading
I agree the gui looks a bit dated but I am not too fussed since I think the capability is awesome.
If you haven't seen it already take a look at the "7.4 Elastic properties and warp markers" video on the Digidesign web site. I just love the way the guy stretches a kick sound using a Polyphonic algorithm to make it go Boooooooooooooommmmm. I tried to do this in Live but I did not get such a great result.
If you learn the keyboard shortcuts too the workflow is also very efficient.
I have recently started using Pro Tools again (after putting it down for a year) because I wanted to use the following capabilities that are currently not available in Live ...
Audio quantizing and grooving
Region Fading
I agree the gui looks a bit dated but I am not too fussed since I think the capability is awesome.
If you haven't seen it already take a look at the "7.4 Elastic properties and warp markers" video on the Digidesign web site. I just love the way the guy stretches a kick sound using a Polyphonic algorithm to make it go Boooooooooooooommmmm. I tried to do this in Live but I did not get such a great result.
If you learn the keyboard shortcuts too the workflow is also very efficient.
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
Pro Tools is industry standard because it was the first big digital DSP/Computer based rig that made people leave analog tape recording behind and because of this the studios invested heavily in it and moving to other DAWS such as Logic, Cubase/Nuendo, Samplitude/Sequoia was not cost effective, even though the competition caught up and surpassed PT both in terms of features and cost several years ago. Live offers more features too, even if you prefer the warping algorithm in PTLE.
And because it was first and built up a huge following, it just became the go to program for studios.
Pro Tools HD (the system studios use which costs many thousands of dollars) has more features than PTLE so can't be compared. The only reason anyone uses PTLE or M-Powered is due to a) believing the hype about it being 'industry standard' and b) you can dump your project files straight into the PTHD system used by studios.
Pro Tools LE / M-Powered ties you to specific hardware (such as M-Audio for M-Powered or the MBOX, which is crap, or Digi 002/003), has no plugin delay compensation, no track freezing, very basic MIDI. It is fine for audio editing and the new time stretching is one positive feature in a sea of crap.
But again, this is only my opinion. I know plenty of other who share it but if it floats your boat, why would you care what I thought
And because it was first and built up a huge following, it just became the go to program for studios.
Pro Tools HD (the system studios use which costs many thousands of dollars) has more features than PTLE so can't be compared. The only reason anyone uses PTLE or M-Powered is due to a) believing the hype about it being 'industry standard' and b) you can dump your project files straight into the PTHD system used by studios.
Pro Tools LE / M-Powered ties you to specific hardware (such as M-Audio for M-Powered or the MBOX, which is crap, or Digi 002/003), has no plugin delay compensation, no track freezing, very basic MIDI. It is fine for audio editing and the new time stretching is one positive feature in a sea of crap.
But again, this is only my opinion. I know plenty of other who share it but if it floats your boat, why would you care what I thought
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.
Grab something free like audacity for audio editing and keep protools out of the equation. Will cost the same and work way better.
Protools is more a complete daw, not an audio editor.
I don't hate protools but I admit mbox are total pieces of krap when it comes to be used with other apps
-B
Protools is more a complete daw, not an audio editor.
I don't hate protools but I admit mbox are total pieces of krap when it comes to be used with other apps
-B
feug.net -:- virb.com/feug
I can relate to everything you say. As I say I have yet to try PT, and I am also wondering if the genre of music being produced would also be a factor.leedsquietman wrote:
But again, this is only my opinion. I know plenty of other who share it but if it floats your boat, why would you care what I thought
Probably someone who has produced reggae and other genres with both Live & PT could come on the forum and give thier opinion.
fe real!
-
- Posts: 6659
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:56 am
- Location: greater toronto area
Well, migrate to another DAW like Sonar, Cubase or Logic with a decent audio interface and you'll soon realize that your comment sounds fairly ridiculous.
It's like saying 'My car works. Screw power steering, anti-lock brakes, power windows and a nice CD player - my car has been getting me to work with no power steering, no anti-lock brakes, manual wind down windows and I like my 2 band manual tune push button radio' - then you actually drive a car with power steering, anti-lock brakes, power windows and a kick ass CD stereo system and you think "Wow. I've been driving a piece of shit for years when I could have had this luxury - DOH !'
People have gotten by using Audacity, if you;re going to use that argument and that is FREEWARE. PTLE is freeware quality software, you pay for the hardware and that is not amazing, not even the Digi003, I'd prefer a MOTU or RME interface.
Having track freeze (which works beautifully in Live) or similar (such as offline processing in Cubase for audio tracks) relieves a lot of stress on your CPU. How can haing no plugin delay compensation be a positive - having to run exactly the same plugins on every track or messing about manually entering numbers to stop things going out of sync (unless you use no plugins at all) - yes, it helps make you decisive. it makes you LIMITED. Limited and inflexible. All of which can be avoided by simply going for pretty much any other DAW in the same price range as PTLE.
It's like saying 'My car works. Screw power steering, anti-lock brakes, power windows and a nice CD player - my car has been getting me to work with no power steering, no anti-lock brakes, manual wind down windows and I like my 2 band manual tune push button radio' - then you actually drive a car with power steering, anti-lock brakes, power windows and a kick ass CD stereo system and you think "Wow. I've been driving a piece of shit for years when I could have had this luxury - DOH !'
People have gotten by using Audacity, if you;re going to use that argument and that is FREEWARE. PTLE is freeware quality software, you pay for the hardware and that is not amazing, not even the Digi003, I'd prefer a MOTU or RME interface.
Having track freeze (which works beautifully in Live) or similar (such as offline processing in Cubase for audio tracks) relieves a lot of stress on your CPU. How can haing no plugin delay compensation be a positive - having to run exactly the same plugins on every track or messing about manually entering numbers to stop things going out of sync (unless you use no plugins at all) - yes, it helps make you decisive. it makes you LIMITED. Limited and inflexible. All of which can be avoided by simply going for pretty much any other DAW in the same price range as PTLE.
http://soundcloud.com/umbriel-rising http://www.myspace.com/leedsquietmandemos Live 7.0.18 SUITE, Cubase 5.5.2], Soundforge 9, Dell XPS M1530, 2.2 Ghz C2D, 4GB, Vista Ult SP2, legit plugins a plenty, Alesis IO14.