anyone using an iMac for production?

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.
Paranoid
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:42 am

anyone using an iMac for production?

Post by Paranoid » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:10 pm

Any of you using an iMac for production? Is an iMac too slow for this, should I go for a used dual G5 instead? I need an all in one solution for playing gigs and also production. Any ideas?

thelike5
Posts: 2047
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 10:12 pm

Post by thelike5 » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:03 pm

People used to use Amigas for production... at least for sequencing...

The G5 Imac (or G4) is more than suitable for studio work! I started out using a G3 imac 600mhz 2546 of ram! I even trusted it on the road playing live! I learned a ton using that machine and until the software became too processor intensive, it worked very well!

I guess the main question to ask yourself is, how many vst's or vsti's you plan on using simultaniusly as that has always been what has slowed my cpu down.

The G5 imac is a great machine. As are the G4's (both Imac's and powermacs and powerbooks). You could probably save quite a bit of money on a G4 which you will no doubt spend on RAM for any machine, G5 or otherwise.

Best!

CWoodOne
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:45 am
Location: Collingswood, NJ

Post by CWoodOne » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:09 pm

If you're using Reaktor or any other CPU intensive app, you may be really disappointed. 1 instance of Reaktor + Izotope will crash my iMac g5 with 1 gig of Ram. So will 1 session of Kontakt with the built in convolution reverb.

MarkH
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:52 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA.
Contact:

Re: anyone using an iMac for production?

Post by MarkH » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:10 pm

Paranoid wrote:Any of you using an iMac for production? Is an iMac too slow for this, should I go for a used dual G5 instead? I need an all in one solution for playing gigs and also production. Any ideas?
Live only uses 1 CPU for the audio engine anyway. Performance tests show a 2ghz iMac performs identical a Powermac 2x2Ghz. So yes, the fastest iMac is actually the best bang for buck Mac you can get.
Accidents are the portal to discovery!

Paranoid
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:42 am

Post by Paranoid » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:11 pm

yeah I figured as much..I really only use live instruments(bass,guitar,e-drums,vocals) and absynth etc for now. Doesnt Reaktor crash a dual G5 too? I think I read that somewhere. Actually, after checking ebay it seems a dual 1.8 g5 is about the same price as a 17" iMac anyway...doesnt make much sense to get the iMac if that is the case. I have no problem lugging the dual G5 to gigs...I will just need a flat screen monitor and those are pretty cheap anyway...300 bucks or so..

CWoodOne
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:45 am
Location: Collingswood, NJ

Post by CWoodOne » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:28 pm

There are some nice road cases for iMacs out there. Really wish the poor thing had more horsepower. Izotope's spectal delay will take all the available CPU. Found myself using Albino, Blue, and Operator more than I ever would have because they were light on CPU. Of course Reason also. But it's impossible to run, say BFD and Reaktor at the same time, and who WOULDN'T want to be able to do that? :) PC's can do that with no sweat.

Paranoid
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:42 am

Post by Paranoid » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:35 pm

Yeah it really is a disgrace how crappy the new macs are performance wise when it comes to real life use. A run of the mill PC costing less than HALF of what a mac costs will smoke a mac at most apps. Pretty sad.

I dont want to switch to PC though..I use one all day at work, that is bad enough...

supposedly the new laptops will be out in January that are wintel...so... I am not sure what to do...I just need a mac I can gig with and do some production work...

rajcoont
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:14 pm

Post by rajcoont » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:36 am

i have a imac 2Ghz and a 12" powerbook 1Ghz.......the imac has never choked on anything i've thrown at it.......i can't play back anything i have done lately on my powerbook though.......it's not the best thing out there, but i have nothing but praise for the imac.....the only good deal in price/performance in apples line up right now.........however, i also wouldnt' be buying anything this close to MWSF unless i really needed it (and a couple holiday gigs would be considered needing it imho)

Paranoid
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:42 am

Post by Paranoid » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:09 am

By you're and my own definition...I "need it". ;) I wish I could wait and see what happens with the wintel machines but I need a solution soon.

D DAS
Posts: 890
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 7:37 am

Post by D DAS » Tue Nov 29, 2005 10:45 am

I use a 1mac g5 with only 1.6 ghz with a gig of ram and it has worked just fine, got a cool i lugger bag for it as well. highly reccomend the ilugger if you are going to gig with it.

nobbystylus
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 4:32 pm
Location: london

Post by nobbystylus » Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:51 am

I'm using a powermac g4 GigaDesigns upgrade (2.0Ghz), and i have to say that Reaktor and Live run rather well for me....
http://www.myspace.com/wardclerk
http://www.myspace.com/bighairufreqs
LIVE 8.21/ Reaktor 5.51/VDMX/Quartz Composer

polyslax
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Post by polyslax » Tue Nov 29, 2005 3:24 pm

I'm running Live 5, Reaktor 5, Kontakt 2, Trash, Ozone, Minimonsta, MX4, Ultra Analog, String Studio etc. on a G5iMac 1.8ghz/1gb/Tiger, no problems. I do tend to render to audio rather than run a ton of midi tracks though. Overall quite happy with the setup, but anticipating major improvements to Live performance when the Intel move happens.
Image Image

Paranoid
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:42 am

Post by Paranoid » Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:03 pm

hmm...the upgrade option would be pretty cheap..those GigaDesign upgrades are only around 350 bucks...

kenn michael
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:03 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by kenn michael » Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:48 am

I'm able to run a couple of instances of Reaktor on my 2.0GHz iMac with no problem.

AdamJay
Posts: 4757
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Indianapolis, USA

Post by AdamJay » Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:26 am

working on a track now.
pretty plug-in heavy.....
G5 iMac 1.8ghz. 512 samples, 44.1khz, 24bit. internal soundcard


1 Automat AU Bassline, monophonic. Ableton EQ4
1 Kontakt 2 with Scarbee Rhodes (4v) Library, peaking with 12 voices polyphony. + Ableton EQ4
1 Reaktor 5 Ensemble running the "Massive" beatbox + Sonalksis SV-315 Compressor.
1 Reaktor 5 Ensemble running the "Oki Computer" Synth (3 note polyphony)
1 Impulse with 8 sounds sent to individual channels. - Each impulse sound channel gets Sonalksis SV-517 EQ, 2 of them also get Sonalksis SV-315 Compressor.

= 12 channels.

Returns -
1 = AUMatrixReverb on Maximum Quality Setting
2 = AudioDamage DubStation Delay
3 = AudioDamage 907A Filterbank.

Master -
Hydratone, Wave Arts FinalPlug.

CPU = 75% Thats 4 Instrument plugins, 8 Sonalksis EQs, 3 Sonalksis Comps, And 5 more processing plugs in the returns and master.
= 20 third party plug-ins.

remove the Reaktor "Massive" ensemble and its 50%. remove the Reaktor "Oki Computer" ensemble and its 35%. Reaktor is a pig. I'm using Automat + Operator more and more.

hope this helps.

Post Reply