Dear Mr. Henke, we are voting now for Looper in Live 8!

Discuss music production with Ableton Live.

Ableton Looper for Live 8

Yes, yes, yes!
187
87%
No
27
13%
 
Total votes: 214

bigbadotis
Posts: 836
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 10:31 pm
Location: rochester, ny
Contact:

Post by bigbadotis » Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:23 am

Johnisfaster wrote:how is using live and bomes "needlessley comlex" honostly? how bout this, a little idea I've had..... "do what it takes to get the job done" sounds like a plan to me.

I mean really, once you get bomes set up all you do is double click on live and double click on bomes and you're going perfectly. so thats 4 clicks with a bit of preperation...
"Needlessly complex" means "it could be simpler". If you don't agree with that, then you're just being argumentative.

There have already been a few different features mentioned in this thread that cannot currently be implemented with any reasonable combination of Live + 3rd party software.

<edited because it's just not worth it>

OvertoneZero
Posts: 1347
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:16 pm

Post by OvertoneZero » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:22 am

bigbadotis wrote: it would be great in 8 to overdub easily. Into the same clip.
bigbadotis wrote: it would be great in 8 to overdub easily. Into the same clip.
bigbadotis wrote: it would be great in 8 to overdub easily. Into the same clip.

longjohns
Posts: 9088
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 3:42 pm
Location: seattle

Post by longjohns » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:21 pm

midistroke = mac

and classic bome's is free

hoffman2k
Posts: 14718
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 6:40 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by hoffman2k » Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:35 pm

Right.. So it takes 2 minutes to set it up..

Now how do i share it with somebody who is on another platform and doesn't know the difference between MIDI, Audio and ASCII?

If it were a Live only thing, it would be as simple as "double-click on the .als file".
At least we could get somewhere after explaining what a .als file is.

Btw, why are people arguing about how easy it is to use 3rd party apps... With the developers of the 3rd party apps in question? :lol:
They know why they wrote it. They spent time thinking up solutions. They spent time documenting problems..

As a writer of many workarounds, I don't have any problem at all seeing the usefulness in eliminating as many unneeded steps as possible.

Angstrom
Posts: 14923
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 2:22 pm
Contact:

Post by Angstrom » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:40 pm

I certainly think Ableton should make a looper.

A good Ableton looper should be akin to the Beatrepeat device, but more flexible. IE a seemingly simple buffer toy, which has good abuse potential.

As many people have said; overlaying audio and 'fade' are important parts of looping, but it can be extended much further. Overdubbing loopers are great for creating sound scapes which are almost 'orchestral'.
I often use my loopers to 'carve' and shape sound, so that on each pass around the loop I alter the eq or an effect, which cumulatively shapes the sound for later use.
This isn't possible any other way. It's great for creating complex 'organic' soundbeds, or glitched up beats.

I would post an example or two but I have to drive some burlesque dancers and a contortionist to Birmingham right now. Wish me luck :)

philipc
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:29 pm
Location: Bristol, UK.
Contact:

Post by philipc » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:29 pm

Could Sampler be improved so that it'd do this? Imagine the sound mangling capabilities of Sampler messing with loops recorded in real time.

nowtime
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:24 pm
Location: Homefree

Post by nowtime » Sat Oct 27, 2007 5:52 pm

Angstrom wrote:I certainly think Ableton should make a looper.

A good Ableton looper should be akin to the Beatrepeat device, but more flexible. IE a seemingly simple buffer toy, which has good abuse potential.

As many people have said; overlaying audio and 'fade' are important parts of looping, but it can be extended much further.
Would love to hear any elaborations on the "extended much further". You ARE the guru of the loopers. Does it have anything to do with contortionism?

OvertoneZero
Posts: 1347
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:16 pm

Post by OvertoneZero » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:47 pm

Angstrom wrote:
I would post an example or two but I have to drive some burlesque dancers and a contortionist to Birmingham right now. Wish me luck :)

My weekend suddenly feels very boring.

KU
Posts: 309
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Contact:

Post by KU » Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:59 am

Angstrom wrote:I certainly think Ableton should make a looper...

...I would post an example or two but I have to drive some burlesque dancers and a contortionist to Birmingham right now. Wish me luck :)
yeah... good luck

where is angstrolooper 1.0?


After Live 6 came out it was this big shock that they didn't produce a native looper. You stepped back and said... "look take my design - I no longer need to develp angstrolooper because the Abes are sure to implement this - I'll just cavort around with contortionists and be a freewheelin musician!"

Its just bizzaro world that we are at Live 7 and they are throwing out slicers and video rendering and other features not serving IVE performance.

*shoots himself in face*

Nightrider
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:59 am
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Nightrider » Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:18 am

All we want is a sound on sound looper that you can set the bar length and have a number of undo and redo functions.

Simple really.

nowtime
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:24 pm
Location: Homefree

Post by nowtime » Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:16 pm

Well;

Looking at these numbers so far, 1400 hits and 57 votes, we can assume that an Ableton Looper is not a very popular idea. Quite surprising, actually. Perhaps y'all do not know what you're missing.

Techies: How hard would it be, do you think, for Ableton to implement LENGTH OF 1st LOOP = BPM ?

dj superflat
Posts: 1279
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 5:31 pm
Location: leadville, CO

Post by dj superflat » Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:23 pm

all those pointing to kid beyond are missing the point. that's a glorified multitracker, plus it has almost no flexibility (that is, it's not an instrument, geared to a specific song generally, specific parts laid down in a certain way, etc.).

and workarounds with send, etc., don't work, because you would need an endless number of tracks to record on and over, etc.

for those who need this now, check mobius, it's the bomb.

OvertoneZero
Posts: 1347
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:16 pm

Post by OvertoneZero » Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:39 pm

I'd be pretty stoked if there was an audio overdub button that functioned essentially in the same manner as the midi overdub button... nice and super simple.

Rogue Scrunt
Posts: 1272
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:32 am
Location: Colorado Springs, USA

Post by Rogue Scrunt » Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:01 pm

anyone ever use POlar in Digital Performer?




I think this is exactly what you guys are talking about

here is a video describing it
http://www.magicd.com/mpegs/POLAR.mpeg
for lots of great records, check out,
http://stores.ebay.com/id=64360994?ssPageName=ME:F:ST

Librado
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:37 pm

Post by Librado » Tue Oct 30, 2007 3:22 am

isnt this how you live loop kid beyond style step by step in a simple concise video??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAA3PkWBHuY

As i dont know my arse from my elbow with all this yet, i dont know if this is good or not but im thinking its thumbs up, right?

Post Reply